Global Squirming
We know the Marcellus Shale Coalition never put it to a vote, but does Pennsylvania DEP Secretary, Michael Krancer, believe that climate change might determine the new “price of doing business” in our state?
On February 20, 2013, at a Pennsylvania House Budget Hearing, Rep. Scott Conklin [D-77th, Centre County] asked the Secretary exactly that, but the newly bearded Krancer didn’t want to answer.
Published on Feb 20, 2013
Rep. Conklin deserves kudos for asking about the cost of climate change. So does Rep. Matt Bradford [D- 70th, Montgomery County] for following up, as State Impact Pennsylvania’s Marie Cusick reports in DEP Secretary Michael Krancer Clarifies Views on Climate Change, February 21, 2013:
“Climate change. Is it real?”
“Representative, I couldn’t be more clear,” Krancer replied, “the lowering of greenhouse gases and carbon emissions is a good thing.”
“You couldn’t be more opaque!” shouted Bradford.
And, so, the question remains: Is Pennsylvania’s rush to frack increasing or decreasing the amount of carbon in the atmosphere?
Methane may be a cleaner fuel to burn (until it explodes) but it’s certainly not a clean fuel to frack from the ground. One glimpse at this infrared video of gas production sites shows how much gas is released, intentionally and otherwise.
Are we really willing to bet it all on gas drillers best practices, minimal air sampling and lousy DEP record-keeping? This seems ignorant and brash when our planet is so perilously close to an atmospheric carbon tipping point.
Pennsylvania deserves better.
- No-Show: A Public Hearing on DEP Missed Hearing From DEP, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, February 23, 2013
“Witnesses criticized the state Department of Environmental Protection for failing to enforce drilling regulations. Some residents in drilling areas brought what they consider as evidence — jugs of orange-brown tap water.”
- DEP Owes Complete Disclosure to Citizens, Editorial, Observer-Reporter.com, February 20, 2013.
“As committee member Rep. Kevin Boyle of Philadelphia County said Tuesday, ‘I apologize for DEP. As Pennsylvania citizens, you deserve better.’ ”
- Residents Take DEP To Task In Hearing About Fracking by Rachel Morgan, ShaleReporter.com, February 19, 2013
“Many times over the last few years, we have reached out to the DEP for help, with little or no success,” Headley said. His family has had issues with contaminated water and grass that refuses to grow, as well as issues with a pipeline going in under their stream, he said. “I think DEP stands for ‘don’t expect protection,’ ” Headley said.
- Fracking Foes Play With A Stacked Deck, And DEP Knows ‘When To Run’ by Paul Carpenter, The Morning Call, February 23, 2013.
“At issue is whether deliberate actions by state officials are letting Texas gas industry robber barons do more damage to the environment than was done by coal industry robber barons in the last century, and are endangering people’s health in the process. As I reported in September, I submitted several questions to DEP, in writing, about new DEP rules supposedly designed to protect the environment. Many of the rules, it seemed to me, did the opposite. For example, DEP now allows fracking fluids to accumulate in pits that are only 20 inches above groundwater tables. I’m still waiting for answers.”
- DEP Chief Skeptical On Human Role In Climate Change, Philly.com, February 22, 2013
“There is no uniformity within the scientific community on how much the warming is occurring,” said Krancer, “And there’s no agreement about how much is attributable to the human part of it and how much is attributable to other factors.”
DEP Throws Wide Mouth Bass Under The Bus
On February 22, 2013, Secretary Krancer did somehow find the time to swing by the offices of The Williamsport Sun-Gazette to sing a few cheers for fracking. DEP’s continued efforts at stacking the publicity deck in favor of gas drillers, while ignoring the citizens whose water tables have been destroyed by those same drillers, only confirms that selling gas is their top priority.
Meanwhile, in the Susquehanna River, widemouth bass are still suffering black spots, lesions and atypical gender development.
- Pa. Fish And Boat Commission Clashes With DEP Over Susquehanna River by Susan Phillips, State Impact Pennsylvania, January 29, 2013
- Letters: State Should Declare Susquehanna River “Impaired”, by Harry Campbell, Pennsylvania Executive Director, Chesapeake Bay Foundation and Liz G. Deardorff, Director, American Rivers’ Clean Water Program – Pennsylvania PennLive.com, February 21, 2013.
Tags: Marcellus Shale Coalition, Michael Krancer, Political Theater, Rep. Matt Bradford, Rep. Scott Conklin, Susquehanna River
February 25, 2013 at 6:11 am |
Dear friends,
One of the things we need to do to stop fracking is to have an alternative. I have started a petition on the White House’s “We, the People Website to have the US Department of Energy conduct a study on transitioning to renewable energy by 2030 without fossil or nuclear power.
I wanted to let you know about a new petition I created on We the People, a new feature on WhiteHouse.gov, and ask for your support. Will you add your name to mine? If this petition gets 100,000 signatures by March 24, 2013, the White House will review it and respond!
We the People allows anyone to create and sign petitions asking the Obama Administration to take action on a range of issues. If a petition gets enough support, the Obama Administration will issue an official response.
You can view and sign the petition here:
http://wh.gov/vmC3
Here’s some more information about this petition:
Conduct a study on converting the US to renewable energy by 2030 without fossil fuel or nuclear power.Dr. Jacobson at the University of California at Davis and Dr. Delucchi at Stanford University in their Nov. 2009 Scientific American article and in
their March 2011 articles in Energy Policy journal have outline a plan for the world to convert to renewable energy without fossil fuel or the use of nuclear power, using existing technology. Germany has adopted a similar plan and will obtain 80% of their energy from renewable sources and shut down all of their nuclear power plants by 2022. The German government, the Chancellor
and the Bundestag(parliament) from Conservative to Green, left to right are united behind this plan. Why can’t we do that in the United States? How did the politicians in Germany overcome the lobbying and campaign money from the energy and the electric utilities?
Just copy and past the link above or click on it and sign the petition.http://wh.gov/vmC3
I have 30 days to gather 100,000 signatures.
Thanks,
Paul Roden